Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 30, 1996No. 93 C 4140PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff James Matthews brought this cause of action against his former employer Commonwealth Edison Company (“ComEd”) alleging that he was discriminated against in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”). ComEd moved for summary judgment on both counts pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. • Matthews cross-filed for summary judgment on his ADA claim. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barnes v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- James E. Matthews v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Indiana Dept. of Environmental Mgt. v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Oates v. Chattanooga Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Chandler v. Specialty Tires of America (Tennessee), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.