Legal Opinion
In re John T. Szymkowicz
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 2018No. 14-BG-884Published
1Opinion of the Court
Dissenting opinion by Senior Judge Steadman at page 792.
2Per curiam
This attorney-discipline matter arises from respondents' representation of Genevieve Ackerman. In its initial report and recommendation, the Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondents had not been shown to have violated the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct in connection with their representation of Ms. Ackerman, except that respondent Robert King violated D.C. R. Prof. Conduct 1.5 (b), by failing to obtain a written retainer agreement from Ms. Ackerman.
In In re Szymkowicz , 124 A.3d 1078 (D.C. 2015)…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Teru Chang v. Institute for Public-Private Partnerships, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.