Legal Opinion

Mercy Hospital & Medical Center v. Farmers Insurance Group of Cos.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1997No. S054093PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In California, when a hospital provides care for a patient, the hospital has a statutory lien against any judgment, compromise, or settlement received by the patient from a third person responsible for his or her injuries, or the third person’s insurer, if the hospital has notified the third person or insurer of the lien. (Civ. Code,1 §§ 3045.1, 3045.2, 3045.3.) If the hospital is paid at the time the judgment, compromise, or settlement is disbursed, it is entitled to receive as much of its lien as can be satisfied out of 50 percent of *216the recovery. (§§ 3045.2, 3045.4.) The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Nishihama v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Newton v. ClemonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API