Legal Opinion
California Institute of Technology v. Hughes Communications Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 6, 2014No. Case No. 2:13-cv-07245-MRP-JEMPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
MARIANA R. PFAELZER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) has asserted U.S. Patent No. 7,116,710 (“the '710 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,421,032 (“the '032 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,916,781 (“the '781 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,284,833 (“the '833 patent,”) against Defendants Hughes Communications, Inc., Hughes Network Systems, LLC, DISH Network Corporation, DISH Network L.L.C., and dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C. (collectively, “Hughes”). Hughes has asserted several defenses, including the invalidity and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- California Institute of Technology v. Hughes Communications Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Andritz Inc. v. Cortex North America CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Guardant Health, Inc. v. Foundation Medicine, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- Kluhsman Machine, Inc. v. Dino Paoli SRLDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
- Shure Incorporated v. Clearone, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.