Legal Opinion

State v. Keep

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Multnomah: Gilbert W. Phelps, Judge. Department 1. • Statement by Mr. Justice Burnett. A lengthy indictment in this case charges Joseph B. Keep jointly with William 0. Borchers with the crime of obtaining money from Frank Yan Stralen by false pretenses. Borchers was discharged from the indictment so that he could be used as a witness for the state. Keep appeals from a conviction on a verdict of guilty.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

From the record we glean what may be deemed the salient facts in the matter involved. Keep was promoting an irrigation project in Wasco County, and needed money to meet his pay-roll. About that time, without having any title to the same, he conveyed some land to his daughter, Emma M. Janin, and her husband, E. C. Janin. The daughter and her husband made a promissory note payable to Borchers for $3,000, and likewise executed a mortgage on the tract securing the note. With the note and mortgage Keep applied to Borchers to raise, the money for him. Borchers had $1,500 on deposit in a bank. He…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RenickOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State v. WhiteakerOregon Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Timmins v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. People v. StewartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Capos v. Clatsop CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API