State v. Renick
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Thos. A. Stephens, Judge. George Renick having been indicted for obtaining money by false pretenses demurred to the indictment. The demurrer was sustained, and the state appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Wolverton
The indictment in this case charges, in substance, that the defendant, George Renick, did on the tenth day of November, 1896, in Multnomah County, Oregon, willfully and feloniously, with intent to defraud, by means of a certain false token, towit, himself, the said George Renick, falsely and fraudulently present himself, the said George Renick, and represent and pretend to one Carrie Meyer, an unmarried woman, that he, the said George Renick, was one Charles Smith, that he was unmarried, and competent and in a position to lawfully contract marriage with her, whereas, in truth and in fact, the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GermainOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. KeepOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. BockOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. WhiteakerOregon Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.