Legal Opinion

Kantor v. Hiko Energy, LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-5585PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SAVAGE, District Judge.

In this putative class action complaining of the tactics used to lure customers by competitors in the deregulated electricity supply market, the significant issue presented is whether claims under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (“UTPCPL”) are barred by the Pennsylvania economic loss doctrine. Stated differently, are we bound by the Third Circuit’s predictive holding in Werwinski v. Ford Motor Co., 286 F.3d 661 (3d Cir.2002), that statutory fraud claims may not be brought with a contract action? We conclude that…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Mary Burton v. Teleflex IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Landau v. Viridian Energy PA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. In re FCA US LLC Monostable Electronic Gearshift LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  4. McDonough v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. McGuckin v. Allstate Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API