Legal Opinion
Milosevich v. Board of County Commissioners
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1942No. 4658PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
There was an action brought by plaintiffs in error' against the defendant in error under the provisions of Section 43-301, N.M.S.A.1929 Comp.
The cause was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, whereupon defendant in error moved for and was granted a new trial.
Plaintiff in error seeks a review of the order of the trial court granting the new trial.
Defendant has filed a “Motion to quash writ of error” and a“Motion to dismiss writ of error.”
We consider these motions in the order named.
Movant concedes that beginning with Compiled Laws 1884, Sec.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Tallapoosa v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Albuquerque Gas & Electric Co. v. CurtisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Baldwin v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Elk City Cotton Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Cooper v. BrownfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rio Arriba County Board of Education v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Burns v. FlemingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Scott v. JC Penney CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Wineman v. Kelly's RestaurantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Nally v. Texas-Arizona Motor Freight, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.