Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Best

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from an order at Special Term which vacated a notice of examination before trial on the ground that the notice was defective insofar as it called for the taking of defendant’s testimony by an electronic recording device.

The propriety of recording pretrial testimony in this manner remains an open question in this department. The use of recording devices has, however, been approved in the First Department, by a divided court (Gotthelf v. Hillcrest Lbr. Co., 280 App. Div. 668), and, very recently, in the Second Department as well (Catapano v. Shapiro, 6 A D 2d 1054).

In our…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gotthelf v. Hillcrest Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Rubin v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Vogel v. TestaNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API