Vogel v. Testa
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtL. Barron Hill, J.
On this motion to strike defendant’s answer for failure to appear and be examined before trial, the *773defendant has consented to appear and be examined, providing the examination is taken by a competent shorthand reporter and not by a mechanical recording machine. Th e plaintiff asserts that he has a right to have the examination taken by a recording machine.
Thus far, there appears to be a division of opinion among the justices of this court who have passed upon the propriety of recording examinations before trial. In Gotthelf v. Hillcrest Lbr. Co. (280 App. Div. 668) a three-two majority of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gotthelf v. Hillcrest Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Dudley v. Bonhomme Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Gelman v. PepperNew York Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bradshaw v. BestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958