Legal Opinion
Rubin v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided May 27, 1958No. Claim No. 35223PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander Del Gtorno, J.
Upon a motion previously granted to the claimant by Judge Squire of this court for an examination before trial of the State of New York, through its agents, servants or employees, the claimant’s attorney was prepared to proceed with the said examination with the aid of an Edison voice-writer machine. The Attorney-General has objected to the use of a recording machine, contending that it does not conform to the requirements of rule 129 of the Buies of Civil Practice.
The parties appeared before the court for its instruction regarding this controversy. The machine was produced and operated in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gotthelf v. Hillcrest Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Dudley v. Bonhomme Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- Gelman v. PepperNew York Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Alamo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1966
- Bradshaw v. BestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958