Legal Opinion

Bracken v. Chadburn

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1919No. 3394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Washington County, Fifth District; K. N. Kayes, Judge. Action by Wallace Bracken and others against James W. Chadburn and the New Castle Reclamation Company. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

The plaintiffs asked for a decree adjudging them to be the owners of a certain water filing made in the state engineer’s office by defendant J. W. Chadburn, known as filing No. 1663; also for a decree quieting title thereto against the defendants and annulling an alleged sale or assignment of such filing by the defendant Chadburn to his codefendant, the New Castle Reclamation Company. Denial of any interest in the said water or water filing in the plaintiffs was made by the defendants. The further defense is interposed that the oral contract set out in the complaint is within the statute of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. GallagherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Toland v. CoreyUtah Supreme Court · 1890
  3. McLure v. KoenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  4. Neponset Land & Live Stock Co. v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Lynch v. CoviglioUtah Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olivero v. ElegantiUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API