Legal Opinion

Neponset Land & Live Stock Co. v. Dixon

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1894No. 473PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal, from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, Hon. James A. Miner, Judge. Action in ejectment by the Neponset Land and Live .Stock Company against Julia I. Dixon and George Eastman, Sr., her guardian. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BaRTCH, J.:

This is an action in ejectment brought by the plaintiff •against the defendants, Julia I. Dixon, who is an insane person, and George Eastman, Sr., her guardian, to recover possession of a certain strip of land, being a part of section 24, township 8 N., range 6 E. It is 40 chains long by 6 chains and 10 links wide, and it, together with other land in the same section, was formerly owned by Albert H. Dixon, who was the patentee. Albert H. Dixon was .at one time the husband of Julia I. Dixon, but at the time the transactions over which this controversy arose took place he was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Toland v. CoreyUtah Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. 13 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1400, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,902 in Re Lewis W. Shurtleff, Inc. And Frontier Properties, Inc., Debtors. Thomas D. Elliott, Trustee v. Frontier Properties/lp 102/meadow Glen Arms/79Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Olivero v. ElegantiUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Johnson v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Elliott v. Frontier PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API