Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stanley v. Stanley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1939No. 6110Published

1ConcurrenceWolfe, Justice

I concur in the results. It would perhaps be well if we fastened upon an accurate and consistent expression of the judicial policy of this court in the review of equity cases. The Constitution of Utah, Art. VIII, Sec. 9, not only gives us authority but makes it our duty to review the facts. This has been construed to mean that we review and weigh the evidence as it appears in the record. Lund v. Howell, 92 Utah 232, 67 P. 2d 215 (followed in Id., 92 Utah 250, 67 P. 2d 223) ; Christenson v. Nielsen, 88 Utah 336, 54 P. 2d 430, 432 (where this court held that in an equity case the appellate…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Campbell v. GowansUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Corey v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Zuniga v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Mower v. MowerUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Olivero v. ElegantiUtah Supreme Court · 1923

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API