Legal Opinion

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 20, 1999PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

PORITZ, C.J.

This appeal raises the question whether the construction and related borrowing costs associated with building, renovating and expanding judicial facilities, hereinafter usually referred to as “capital costs,” are to be assumed by the State under a 1992 amendment to the New Jersey Constitution, N.J. Const. art. VI, § VIII, ¶ 1, that governs state funding of the judicial system.

Prior to the amendment, the responsibility for financing the courts was controlled by statute. As enacted in 1991, Title 2B recodified the division of financial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. United States v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Lloyd v. VermeulenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Gormley v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. New Jersey Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ronald Chisolm v. Patrick McManimon Jr., Director of Mercer County Detention Center Mercer County Court, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Doe v. Division of Youth and Family ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  3. Hon. Dana L. Redd v. Vance Bowman(073567)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. Borough of PaulsboroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  5. Dale v. Boy Scouts of America & Monmouth CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API