Laubscher v. Fay
District Court, N.D. Ohio
At Eaw. Action by G. A. Eaubscher, as administrator of the estate of Frederick Treichel, deceased, against W. H. Fay. On motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
DAY, District Judge.
The question here presented arises on a motion for a new trial. G. A. Eaubscher was the administrator of the estate of Frederick Treichel, deceased, and Eaubscher, the administrator, is a resident and citizen of the state of Ohio. Paulina Treichel, widow, and the surviving children of Treichel, are aliens and subjects of the Czar of Russia, and residents of the state of Ohio. The defendant, W. H. Fay, is a citizen and resident of the state of Ohio. So the only question which I will consider, and which is herein considered, is whether this court has jurisdiction of this…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Coal Co. v. BlatchfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Clarke v. MathewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Walden v. SkinnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bolmer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1935