Legal Opinion

Bolmer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 24, 1935No. 223PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, District Judge.

This is an action at law instituted by the committee of an incompetent, appointed under the laws of the commonwealth of Kentucky, to recover on an official bond executed by a prior committee, appointed pursuant to the orders of the Ohio county court. The law and facts are submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury.

The defendant, surety on the bond, makes two defenses; first that this court has no jurisdiction of the action, that its venue is improperly laid; second, that the instrument signed by it as surety was void and of no effect. The facts…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. United States v. MauriceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1823

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blevins v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re Brown's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Estate of Lucrecia Pacheco v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. v. HandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. In Re Guardianship of PachecoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API