Legal Opinion

Acuff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1955No. A-12089PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

' POWELL, Judge.

Ralph Gilbert Acuff, alias Lloyd N. Gur-kin, plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged in the district court of Oklahoma County with the crime of forgery in the second degree. Defendant refused the aid of counsel, and acted as his own attorney in the trial of the case. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and assessed the punishment to be a term of two years in the State Penitentiary. The penalty might, have been seven years. Tit. 21 O.S.1951 § 1621, subd. 2.

Defendant has acted as his own counsel on appeal, and orally argued his case before this…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Gibson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Patterson v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stidham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Regional Transportation District v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Magenton v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API