Legal Opinion

Motorola, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 8, 2008No. 634, 2007PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice:

Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”) appeals the order of judgment in favor of Amkor Technology, Inc. (“Amkor”) following a bench trial in Superior Court. Motorola argues that the trial court erred 1) by not judicially estopping Amkor from changing its argument concerning the relationship of two clauses of a Patent License Agreement (“PLA”); 2) by not entering judgment as a matter of law based on the alleged change in Amkor’s position; and 3) by making factual findings not supported by the record. We find no merit in Motorola’s appeal and affirm.

Facts and Procedural Background

Amkor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. At&T CORP. v. LillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Henderson v. Roadway ExpressAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Insurance Corp. of America v. BarkerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  5. Motorola, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. GMG Capital Investments, LLC v. Athenian Venture Partners ISupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. Paul v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Bresler v. Wilmington Trust Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  4. Land-Lock, LLC v. Paradise Property, LLC.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Chilson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API