Motorola, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGELY, Justice:
Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”) appeals the order of judgment in favor of Amkor Technology, Inc. (“Amkor”) following a bench trial in Superior Court. Motorola argues that the trial court erred 1) by not judicially estopping Amkor from changing its argument concerning the relationship of two clauses of a Patent License Agreement (“PLA”); 2) by not entering judgment as a matter of law based on the alleged change in Amkor’s position; and 3) by making factual findings not supported by the record. We find no merit in Motorola’s appeal and affirm.
Facts and Procedural Background
Amkor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- At&T CORP. v. LillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Henderson v. Roadway ExpressAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Insurance Corp. of America v. BarkerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Motorola, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- GMG Capital Investments, LLC v. Athenian Venture Partners ISupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Paul v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Bresler v. Wilmington Trust Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Land-Lock, LLC v. Paradise Property, LLC.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Chilson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.