Legal Opinion
United Construction Workers v. Electro Chemical Engraving Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 20, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendants for an order, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., dismissing the action on the ground that the Court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter and dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The basic action is a suit by a labor union against two employer corporations (parent and subsidiary) to recover unpaid contributions to welfare and pension ■funds which are now allegedly due and owing from defendants under certain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- General Electric Co. v. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue) v. General Electric Company (Telechron Department, Ashland, Massachusetts)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Mel Warshaw, Edith Warshaw and Mary Namrow v. Local No. 415, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 696 v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1962
- Local No. 90 v. Welbilt Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.