Legal Opinion
United States v. Mid-States Exchange, Robert Hawley and Audrey Hawley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1987No. 85-5373 SDPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Ón October 4, 1985, the District Court 1 denied the motion of Robert and Audrey Hawley under Rule 41(e), F.R.Crim.P., for return of property seized in a search of their home. The Hawleys challenge the validity of the search warrant and also claim that the search and seizure exceeded the scope of the warrant.
Judge Jones decided that the motion was premature, did not consider the merits, and denied the motion without prejudice. United States v. Mid-States Exchange, 620 F.Supp. 358 (D.S.D.1985).
There had been no arrest, complaint, nor indictment of the Hawleys, and they appealed. Mid-States…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Robert E. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Search Warrant for 405 N. Wabash, Suite 3109 Chicago, Illinois, Barry Goodman, Esq., Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Mid-States ExchangeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Rayburn House, Rm 2113, Washington, DcCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Search of Premises Known as 6455 South Yosemite, Englewood, Colorado. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. SteltenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Gary C. RosenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- In Re: 3021 6th Avenue North, Billings, Mt, Gene Bridges, D/B/A Associated Tax Consultants, Claimant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.