Legal Opinion
United States v. Mid-States Exchange
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 4, 1985No. Civ. 85-4214PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
JOHN B. JONES, District Judge.
Defendants herein have moved under F.R.Crim.Pro. 41(e) for return of property seized by various state and federal law enforcement officials, pursuant to warrant, during the course of a federal investigation into alleged tax evasion. Defendants support their motion with allegations of various violations of the Fourth Amendment proscriptions against unreasonable search and seizure.
Inasmuch as no indictment has, as of yet, been filed against defendants pursuant to this investigation, their motion must be construed as a civil action in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Kenneth George MontosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Tommy Truchinski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. SteltenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Mid-States Exchange, Robert Hawley and Audrey HawleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- In re Search Warrants for 14 Straight Street, S.W., 439 Ionia, S.W., & 2026 Chicago DriveDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- United States v. 1328 North Main StreetDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.