United States v. Sol C. Schwartz, Abe Chapman, and Frank C. Marolda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals from the district court’s order excluding the testimony of former co-defendant Raymond F. Lane from the trial of Sol C. Schwartz, Frank C. Marolda and Abe Chapman on charges of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1954 (1982) (offer, acceptance or solicitation to influence operations of employee benefit plan). The government contends that the district court lacked authority to exclude Lane’s testimony absent a violation of the court’s pretrial discovery order. We agree, and we reverse the district court’s exclusionary order.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
In United…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Sam Salvatore Sarcinelli and Pamela Sue MessinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Charles R. Gee, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Darrel Simpson Robert Anderson James FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Bruce Wayne PetersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- State v. SteigerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- United States v. Dirk Francis Jennings, John Daniel Cornwell, Jr., United States of America v. Jason Coler Nichols, Jose Luis Casas, Angela Mary CasasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.