Washington v. Sobina
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
Federal judges reviewing habeas corpus matters often face a difficult assignment. Frequently, the state court records presented are in disarray or incomplete, the defendant was unrepresented or inadequately represented in the state proceedings, and the deference to be accorded is unclear, as it may depend on whether the state court’s decision was based on a finding of fact or conclusion of law. In the appeal before us, the District Court undertook a meticulous examination of the record and the applicable legal principles, but our decision hinges on…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Joseph Coady v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Montgomery the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Holland v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Brown v. WENEROWICZCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Fields v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Ajamu-Osagboro v. PatrickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Champion v. BeasleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.