Legal Opinion

Amsted Industries Incorporated v. Buckeye Steel Castings Company

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 18, 1994No. 93-1552PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ordered Buckeye Steel Castings Company to pay Amsted Industries, Inc. $510,528.90 in attorney fees. This fee award included expert witness fees. Buckeye appeals the award of expert witness fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 (1988). Because the district court exceeded its authority in the award of expert witness fees, this court reverses and remands.

BACKGROUND

This attorney fee award came in the wake of extensive litigation. Amsted sued Buckeye for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 3,664,269 (the ’269 patent). On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Buckeye Steel Castings CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Barnes v. DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Marctec, LLC v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API