Legal Opinion
Bale v. Barnhart
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 18, 2003No. 4-02-0729PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht
Plaintiff Martin L. Bale, d/b/a Bale Excavating and Farm Drainage, filed suit against defendants, William F. Barnhart, Maridel L. Barnhart, and Huntington Mortgage Company (Huntington), seeking to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendants separately moved to dismiss the complaint under section 2 — 619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619 (West 2002)). The circuit court held the claim for lien improperly described the claimant as Carla Bale and granted the defendants’ motions.
Bale appeals and argues (1) the claim for lien was proper; and (2) the complaint nevertheless…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant ChurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Epstein v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Hise v. HullAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Department of Central Management Services v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peter J. Hartmann Co. v. Capitol Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Tefco Construction Co. v. Continental Community Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Goral v. KulysAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Peter J. Hartmann Co. v. CAPITOL BANKAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Bale v. BarnhartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.