Legal Opinion

Hise v. Hull

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 26, 1983No. 4-82-0726PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

Attorney fees.

Under section 2 — 611 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The trial judge dismissed Hise’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Hise filed an amended complaint. Again, the trial judge dismissed the amended complaint, but reserved for future hearing the defendants’ motion for section 2 — 611 attorney fees. Hise appealed to this court.

We must dismiss his appeal.

The pertinent facts follow:

Richard Hise’s wife, Patricia, filed for a legal separation. She retained the law firm of Hull, Campbell, Robinson & Gibson (the law firm) to represent her. After a hearing, the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ariola v. NigroIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bell v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Chicago Miniature Lamp Works, Inc. v. D'AMICOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant ChurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance v. RosethAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Town of Libertyville v. Bank of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Mars v. PriesterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Mucklow v. John Marshall Law SchoolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API