Legal Opinion
Sanderson v. Roethenmund
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 22, 1988No. 85 Civ. 9527 (KC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONBOY, District Judge:
This is an action brought by investors in international certificates of deposit issued by a corporation with which the defendants were associated. Plaintiffs claim that they, and other purchasers of the certificates, are the victims of fraud perpetrated by the defendants in the marketing of the certificates in question.
Defendants Otto Roethenmund, Leslie Deak, Liselotte M. Deak, and the Estate of Nicholas Deak move to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Rules 9(b), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,614 the Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Marine Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,366 Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc., James F. Pritchard, Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Denny v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996
- Blatt v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Pahmer v. GreenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Holloway v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.