Legal Opinion
Blatt v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 23, 1996No. Civil Action 94-2348PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (hereinafter the “SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This motion has been decided upon the written submissions of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
BACKGROUND
A. Introduction
The dispute in this case centers on how well defendants disclosed…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nolfi v. Ohio Kentucky Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Sidney Olmsted v. Pruco Life Insurance Company Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- In Re Campbell Soup Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Northstar Financial Advisors, Inc. v. Schwab InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.