Legal Opinion
Holloway v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1989No. Nos. 87-1486, 87-1490PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
The issue presented in this interlocutory appeal is whether certain instruments issued by three Oklahoma entities — Republic Bancorporation, Inc. (RBI), and its two non-bank subsidiaries, Republic Trust & Savings (RTS), a trust company, and Republic Financial Corporation (RFC), a finance company — are securities within the meaning of the federal securities laws. We hold that the instruments issued by RFC and RTS are securities. However, because material issues of fact remain regarding RBI’s issuance of a note, we remand to the district court for further consideration of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Uselton v. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. HallDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996
- In Re Republic Trust & Savings CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.