Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ekern v. Zimmerman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1925PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following decision was announced June 2, 1925:

By the Court. — The motion to quash the alternative writ" of mandamus is denied, and a peremptory writ is ordered issued as prayed for. An opinion will be filed later.

The following opinion was‘filed June 22, 1925:

Doerfler, J.

The issues presented herein are of great importance. As stated in the petition, a scheme of internal improvements of the state is involved. Defendant’s counsel takes the position that the constitutional amendment of 1924 limits the expenditures for both highway and forestry purposes to two tenths of a mill of the taxable…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  2. Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wisconsin Industrial School for Girls v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bankers Life Insurance v. RobbinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Thompson v. CraneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kayden Industries, Inc. v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API