Legal Opinion

Best Advertising Corporation v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company and the Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 6, 1965No. 14691_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Circuit Judge.

This treble damage suit was brought pursuant to Section 4 of the Clayton Act, *101015 U.S.C. § 15, for damages allegedly sustained as a result of defendants’ violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2.1 Defendants moved to dismiss upon the ground the complaint failed to state a claim against defendants or either of them. The District Court granted the motion and ordered that the complaint be dismissed. This appeal followed.

Illinois Bell Telephone Company (Bell) furnishes telephone service to Illinois subscribers. It furnishes each…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Ace Beer Distributors, Inc. v. Kohn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. Lorain Journal Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ad-Vantage Telephone Directory Consultants, Inc., Cross v. Gte Directories Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. America's Best Cinema Corp. v. Fort Wayne Newspapers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1972
  3. Tripoli Company v. Wella CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Ficker v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  5. Paul v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API