Legal Opinion

Cleveland Osteopathic Hospital v. Zangerle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1950No. 31960PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

On the present appeal, it becomes the duty of this court to decide the ultimate question whether under the evidence adduced in this particular case, the decision of the board is unreasonable or unlawful.

In the hearing before the board and on the presentation of this appeal, the hospital relies wholly on that part of Section 5353, General Code, which reads:

“Eeal and tangible personal property belonging to institutions used exclusively for charitable purposes, shall be exempt from taxation. ’ ’

Ba,sed on the theory that all property should bear its proportionate share of the costs of government…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Corvallis General Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Incorporated Trustees of the Gospel Worker Society v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re Complaint of TaxpayersOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Welfare Federation v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. American Issue Publishing Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Highland Park Owners, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bethesda Healthcare, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dialysis Clinic, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Lincoln Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. WarrenOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Malone-Hogan Hospital Clinic Foundation, Inc. v. City of Big SpringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API