Legal Opinion

Highland Park Owners, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1994No. 93-2570PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 5709.12(B) states:

“ * * * Real and tangible personal property belonging to institutions that is used exclusively for charitable purposes shall be exempt from taxation. * * * ”

The commissioner argues that, to qualify for exemption, the property must be owned by a charitable institution, and that since Highland Park is not a charitable institution, the property is not exempt. He also argues that the property is not used exclusively for charitable purposes. We disagree on both counts.

*406Section 2, Article XII of the Ohio Constitution permits the General Assembly to exempt from taxation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White Cross Hospital Ass'n v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Episcopal Parish of Christ Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Wehrle Foundation v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Cullitan v. Cunningham SanitariumOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Cleveland Osteopathic Hospital v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Church of God in Northern Ohio, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dialysis Clinic, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. True Christianity Evangelism v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Case Western Reserve University v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. The Chapel v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API