Legal Opinion
Danz v. Reconstruction Finance Corp
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 1952No. 557PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
193 F.2d 1010
DANZ
v.
RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP.
No. 557.
United States Emergency Court of Appeals
Heard at Philadelphia, Pa., September 21, 1951.
Decided February 4, 1952.
Alexander Boskoff, Washington, D. C., for complainant.
George Arthur Fruit, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., with whom J. Gregory Bruce, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for respondent.
Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER and McALLISTER, Judges.
MAGRUDER, Judge.
1
Complainant, doing a cattle slaughtering business under the name San Mateo Meat Company, received from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Earl C. Gibbs, Inc. v. Defense Supplies CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Armour & Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1947
- Merchants Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Emergency Court of Appeals · 1949
- Bowman v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- West Coast Meat Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorpEmergency Court of Appeals · 1952
- Zitron Bros., Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance CorpEmergency Court of Appeals · 1953