Legal Opinion

United States v. Francis E. Gillings and Ruth Gillings

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1978No. 77-2717PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Per curiam

The Gillingses are tax protesters. They did not file returns for 1971 or 1972, and the government prosecuted them for these failures under 26 U.S.C. § 7203. Francis was convicted for both years and Ruth for 1971; the court directed her acquittal for 1972. We affirm Francis’ convictions and reverse Ruth’s.

The Gillingses originally were furnished appointed counsel, but their appointed attorneys refused to file various groundless motions setting forth the Gillingses’ personal opinions about the tax system. As a result, they discharged their appointed counsel, and after lengthy colloquy with the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. William SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. United States v. Floyd BaloughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Wesley WillieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Alan B. Karme and Laila M. Karme v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Peter R. Fitzpatrick v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API