Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hughes

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2004No. 45A03-0309-CV-370PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals the denial of its motion to set aside a default judgment entered against Tiashonta Thomas in a negligence action filed by Helen and Garland Hughes.

We reverse.

ISSUE 1

Whether the trial court erred in denying State Farm's motion to set aside the default judgment against Thomas.

FACTS

On September 2, 1999, Helen and Garland Hughes were involved in a four-vehicle accident with Tiashonta Thomas, Jessica Randolph and Amy Jeffries. On August 23, 2001, the Hugheses filed a negligence action against the three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Matney Ex Rel. MatneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Fire Insurance Exchange v. Bell Ex Rel. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Van KeppelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Citimortgage, Inc. v. Shannon S. Barabas a/k/a Shannon Sheets Barabas, ReCasa Financial Group, LLC, and Rick A. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Tom Graziani v. D&R ConstructionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Delphi Corp. v. OrlikIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. JarrellsIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Carol Raper, of the Estate of Timothy Raper v. Jill A. Haber, Darrell Havey, and Jane HarveyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API