Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Rubin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 23, 1998No. Civ. A. 97-2768 (PLF), 97-2769 (PLF) and 97-2770 (PLF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

On November 20, 1997, four separate complaints and motions for preliminary injunctions were filed in this Court. The facts and complaints in the four cases are essentially identical except that each has a different named plaintiff or plaintiffs. 1 On December 11, 1997, Judge William Bryant dismissed Lake v. Rubin, Civil Action No. 97-2767, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On December 24, 1997, this Court issued an order consolidating the three remaining cases, setting a briefing schedule on the issue of permanent injunctive relief and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. MerskySupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Frank A. England, III v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. O'Connor v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas Harold Lake and Rose C. Lake v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  2. Francis v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  3. Lake, Thomas Harold v. Rubin, Robert E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Ass'n v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Newman v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API