Legal Opinion

Frank A. England, III v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1986No. 85-2071PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

As a result of federal income tax returns filed by appellant Frank A. England III, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) classified him as a “tax protester.” England sued the IRS under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, seeking to have the words “tax protester” removed from IRS records pertaining to him. The district court dismissed the action on the ground that 26 U.S.C. § 7852(e) deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

The Privacy Act requires each agency that maintains a system of records to “maintain all records which are used by the agency in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robert B. Clarkson v. Internal Revenue Service and John Henderson, District DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Michael T. Albright v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Zeller v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  4. Green v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
  5. Abdeen M. Jabara v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gardner, Bruce E v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  2. Meryl Sue Baker v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Matter of HazelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
  4. O'Connor v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987
  5. Thomas Harold Lake and Rose C. Lake v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API