Curtis Bay Towing Co. v. National Maritime Union of America
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
These are two companion actions brought by tugboat operators against various labor organization defendants and certain of their officers and representatives.1 The first cause of action in each Complaint is based on § 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 187, and alleges that the defendants induced individuals employed by plaintiffs, Pennsylvania Tidewater Dock Company, and employees of others to engage in strikes and other activities in violation of § 8(b) (4) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(b) (4). The second cause of action is the one to which the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Antonio Copra v. Jose A. SuroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. Local 1291 of International Longshoremen's Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Abrams v. Carrier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Wilkes-Barre Publishing Co. v. Newspaper Guild Of Wilkes-BarreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Fabian v. Freight Drivers & Helpers Local No. 557District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
- W. J. Milner and Co. Of Florida v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 349Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Navios Corporation v. National Maritime Union of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.