Legal Opinion

Paul v. U.S. Mutual Financial Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1986No. Docket 85024PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant on the basis that plaintiffs were not entitled to assert the defense of usury on a promissory note. We reverse.

This case had its genesis on April 1, 1979, when plaintiffs purchased a business known as "Doug’s Party Store” from Douglas and Arlene Sindlinger. This business was located in Manchester, Michigan, and consisted of a party store and gasoline filling station. The sale was evidence by: (1) a land contract secured by the real estate on which the business was located and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Wilcox v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Bay City & East Saginaw Railroad v. AustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Amorello v. Monsanto Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Featherly v. Teledyne Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Arbelius v. PolettiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Stone v. MehlbergDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
  5. Lytle v. MaladyMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API