Legal Opinion
Pacifica Corp. v. City of Camarillo
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 1983No. Civ. 68357PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PAEZ, J. *
Appellant Pacifica Corporation (Pacifica) appeals from a judgment denying its petition for a peremptory writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. By its petition Pacifica sought to compel respondents City of Camarillo (City) and the Camarillo City Council (Council) to grant its 1982 application for a residential development allotment under the City’s residential growth control ordinance (Camarillo Mun. Code, § 20.01 et seq.), and to vacate its decision awarding development allotments to respondents Lindborg-Dahl Investors, Inc., the Wittenberg Corporation,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- 20th Century Insurance v. GaramendiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Resource Defense Fund v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Briggs v. City of Rolling Hills EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Joint Council of Interns & Residents v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Security National Guaranty, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.