Legal Opinion

Reid v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1993No. 9228SC448PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

The sole issue is whether or not plaintiff’s complaint states a cause of action for negligence against sixteen state employees in their individual capacities. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

The test on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is whether or not the complaint is legally sufficient. Tennessee v. Environmental Management Comm’n, 78 N.C. App. 763, 765, 338 S.E.2d 781, 782 (1986). In ruling upon such motion, the trial court must view the allegations of the complaint as admitted and on that basis must determine as a matter of law whether or not the allegations state a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hare v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Wiggins v. City of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Wirth v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Miller v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. State ex rel. Tennessee Department of Health & EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Isenhour v. HuttoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Block v. County of PersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Davis v. MesserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Schmidt v. BreedenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API