Legal Opinion
Pomykacz v. Borough of West Wildwood
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 20, 2006No. Civil Action 03-5677 (JEI)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Maureen Pomykacz (“Pomy-kacz”) brings claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 asserting that Defendants violated her constitutional rights by arresting and prosecuting her for stalking Defendants Jacqueline Ferentz and Christopher Fox. Pomykacz also asserts state common law claims of false arrest, malicious prosecution and civil conspiracy. Before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Borough of West Wildwood (the “Borough”) and Fox and the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Ferentz. 1
I,
Pomykacz considers herself…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kelly v. Borough of CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Royce McLin v. Jason ArdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Tichinin v. City of Morgan HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Higginbotham v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Snyder v. DaughertyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.