Legal Opinion

Bertl v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 9, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] John Bertl appeals from a decision of the Maine Public Utilities Commission concluding that Central Maine Power (CMP) was not required to net energy bill an account of Bertl’s located in Kingfield against the output of a small hydroelectric facility owned by Bertl and located in North New Portland. The Commission’s Rule dealing with net energy billing promotes renewable electricity generation. The Rule requires that for net energy billing to be allowed, the generating facility be “on or in the vicinity of the customer’s premises.” Bertl contends that the Commission construed the Rule in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Pine Tree Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. National Industrial Constructors, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. Office of Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitney v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  2. Central Maine Power Company v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. Whitney v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API