Legal Opinion
Blumberg v. Taggart
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1942No. 33,163PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Action to recover $1,200 from defendant Taggart on the basis of fraud practiced by him to plaintiff’s loss in that amount. Liability against defendant insurance company is predicated upon the theory that $1,000 of this amount has been traced into its hands, and that because of Taggart’s fraud this sum became “impressed with a trust in favor” of plaintiff. Taggart defaulted. A trial to the court between the insurance company and plaintiff resulted in findings for the company. Plaintiff’s motion for amended findings or a new trial was denied, judgment was entered, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Floyd v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Curtis, Collins & Holbrook Co. v. United States, and Twenty-Three Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sou-Hsiung Jack CHIU, Appellant, v. Amy Kam-Ling WONG, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Estate of Jones Ex Rel. Blume v. KvammeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, IowaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Shields v. Duggan (In Re Dartco, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- New York Casualty Co. v. SazenskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.