Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Weikel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 22, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

CASE 96. — ACTION BY A. J. WEIKEL AND OTHERS AGAINST THE CITY OP LOUISVILLE. — Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second "Division). Samuel B. Kirby, Judge. Decree for complainant and defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lassing

— Reversing-

This litigation grows, out of an error on the part of certain members of the Dairymen’s Protective Association, suing for themselves and all others similarly situated, to recover of the city of Louisville ■certain license fees, paid to the city under an ordinance, approved April 23, 1898, and entitled “An ordinance licensing milk venders.” Said ordinance is as follows:

“Be it ordained by the general council of the city of Louisville: That every person, firm or corporation selling or vending milk from house to house by wagon, cart or in any other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Newport v. FitzerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lighton v. Abington TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Rice v. Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. River Excursion Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Adams Express Co. v. BoldrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Commissioners Sinking Fund Cty. of Louis. v. WeisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API