Legal Opinion

Weil v. Beresth

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 6, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.

On August 27, 1954, the plaintiff, the defendants Edward Beresth and G-ershon Weil, all three of Connecticut, and Raymond S. Harrison of Florida, who was not made a party defendant, comprised all of the directors of Self Service Sales Corporation, a Connecticut corporation, hereinafter called Sales, which was not made a party defendant, and were the holders of a majority of its stock. On that day, the foregoing stockholders, hereinafter sometimes referred to as signatories, and Sales entered into a written stockholders’ agreement, the portions of which material to this controversy constitute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Galler v. GallerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Connecticut Co. v. DIVISION 425Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. A. M. Larson Co. v. Lawlor Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reynolds Health Care Services, Inc. v. HMNH, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Tankersley v. AlbrightDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  3. Dugan v. GrzybowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Patron v. KonoverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Sagamore Corp. v. Diamond West Energy Corporation and Howard F. BoversCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API