Legal Opinion

Trentman v. Wahrenburg

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1903No. 4,274PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Superior Court of Allen County; J. II. Aiken, Judge. Action by Anthony B. Trentman and others against Henry "Wahrenburg and others for damages for breach of contract. From a judgment for defendants on demurrer to complaint, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

This was an action upon a written contract commenced by appellants against appellees to recover the liquidated damages stated in the contract for its alleged violation by appellees in purchasing of others than appellants certain building material purchased and used by appellees in Allen county, Indiana.

The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the contract entered into between appellants and appellees, upon which the complaint was founded, was illegal and void as being against public policy. The full text of the contract sued upon, omitting the signatures, was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Oakes v. Cattaraugus Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Anchor Electric Co. v. HawkesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Buanno v. WeinraubIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Independent Gas & Oil Co. v. T. B. Smith Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Birmingham Water Works Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Fox Film Corp. v. Ogden Theatre Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  5. J. W. Ripy & Son v. Art Wall Paper MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API