Legal Opinion

Mimnaugh v. Atlantic City Electric Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 12, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Haneman, J. S. C.

This is a motion by the defendant for a judgment on the pleadings. Although an answer and reply have heretofore been filed, it has been agreed by stipulation between counsel that the Court may consider the motion as if no further steps had been taken other than the filing of complaint. It has also been stipulated that the interrogatories and depositions filed herein may be considered upon this motion.

The facts as set forth in the complaint and as amplified by the interrogatories and depositions are as follows:

*313On or about April 23, 1948, plaintiff became the owner of 100…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Slutzker v. RieberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  2. Mayer v. Oxidation Products Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. Casson v. BosmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  4. Fontana v. Polish National Alliance of BrooklynSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  5. Riddle v. Mary A. Riddle Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 68th St. Apts., Inc. v. LauricellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Eliasberg v. Standard Oil Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API